Fragmentation and Segmentation versus Integration? Reflections on the concepts of Indian feudalism and the segmentary state in Indian history

Kulke, Hermann

In: Studies in History, 4 (1982), Nr. 1. pp. 237-263. ISSN 0258-1698

[thumbnail of Fragmentation and Segmentation versus Integration.pdf]
Preview
PDF, English
Download (19MB) | Terms of use

Download (19MB)
For citations of this document, please do not use the address displayed in the URL prompt of the browser. Instead, please cite with one of the following:

Abstract

At present there exist at least three different structural models for the early medieval Indian kingdoms of the post-Gupta and pre-Delhi Sultanate period (c. 550-1200 A.D.): (i) The "conventional model" of a rather unitary, centrally organized kingdom with a strong central bureaucracy; (ii) the Marxist-influenced "Indian feudalism model" of decentralized feudal states (which, however, presupposes the existence of an earlier rather strong central state which had been weakened through feudalization of the society); and (iii) the model of a "segmentary state" which allots the Hindu kingdom a position on a continuum of governance formation between the tribal "stateless" form of government and the unitary state.

Document type: Article
Version: Secondary publication
Date Deposited: 06 Jun 2017
ISSN: 0258-1698
Faculties / Institutes: Miscellaneous > Individual person
DDC-classification: General history of Asia Far East
Controlled Keywords: Indien, Feudalismus, Geschichte
Uncontrolled Keywords: Indischer Feudalismus, segmentäre Gesellschaft, indisches Reich / Indian Feudalism, Segmentary State, Indian kingdom
Subject (classification): History and Archaeology
Countries/Regions: India
Series: Personen > Schriften von Hermann Kulke
Volume: 35