Oriental Research between Philology, Botany and Poetics?

Hanneder, Jürgen

In: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 152 (2002), Nr. 2. pp. 295-308. ISSN 0341-0137

[thumbnail of A9.pdf]
Preview
PDF, English
Download (1MB) | Terms of use

Download (1MB)
For citations of this document, please do not use the address displayed in the URL prompt of the browser. Instead, please cite with one of the following:

Abstract

Probably everyone who has attempted to translate a classical Sanskrit text with some amount of real-life information on plants will retain some sort of bad (scientific) conscience. Often one resorts to dictionaries for identification, in the best case supplemented by scattered studies that centre either on single texts or on authors, well aware of the fact that these dictionaries do not represent the current state of research. And although we know that modern Western and ancient Eastern terminology often only seem to match as long as we have the dictionary before us, but differ confusingly when we examine indigenous definitions, we could easily tend to think that in the case of plants the matter might be easier than in the case of, for instance, philosophy.

Document type: Article
Version: Secondary publication
Date Deposited: 22 Sep 2020
ISSN: 0341-0137
Faculties / Institutes: Miscellaneous > Individual person
DDC-classification: Other languages
General history of Asia Far East
Controlled Keywords: Sanskrit, Literatur, Botanik
Uncontrolled Keywords: Indien, Poesie, Lotus / India, Poetry, Lotus
Subject (classification): Indology
Countries/Regions: India
Series: Personen > Schriften von Jürgen Hanneder
Volume: 10